spoon-business: Judiciary Reform, this time it's true!

[Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've tried to fix the problems the draft proposals had, I hope you'll like
them better this time :)

<proposal>
<title>Judicial reform 1</title>

Replace the text of rule 126 with the following LEGULEIO delimited text
LEGULEIO
Any player may submit a Call For Judgement (CFJ) by posting his intention
to a public list together with a Statement to be judged and optionally an
analyisis. That Player shall be known as the Plaintiff with regard to the
CFJ. While submitting CFJ the Plaintiff may also specify a player as
Defendant for that CFJ.
Calls for Judgement is given a serial number as if it were a revisable
object. A CFJ cannot be modified once submitted.
LEGULEIO
</proposal>

***

<proposal>
<title>Judicial Reform 2</title>
Replace the text of rule 128 with the following GIUDICATO delimited text

GIUDICATO
A Judge shall, within seven days of eir selection, give one of the
following responses to the Call for Judgment to which e was assigned,
accompanied by analysis:

1. Refused: A Judge may refuse to hear the Request if it lacks a clear
Statement or is not germain to the game.
2. True: The Statement is true.
3. False: The Statement is false.
4. Undecided: It cannot be determined at the time of the Judgment whether
the Statement is true or false.
[[completly ripped off from A Nomic]]

This response constitutes the judge's Judgment on that CFJ and has the same
serial number of the CFJ
A Judge's decision shall have the force of law.
GIUDICATO
</proposal>

[[proposal 157 does more or less the same thing, but this version of the
rule is better IMO]]

***

<proposal>
<title>Judicial Reform 3 or crime and punishment</title>

create a new rule named "Misbehaving Judges" with the following CATTIVONE
delimited text
CATTIVONE
the List of Misbehaving Judges (LMJ) is a list of players.
A player is removed from the LMJ two nweeks after he entered it.

When this proposal passes, remove all players from the LMJ, then this
paragraph deletes itself. [[so we're sure no player is tagged as
Misbehaving]]
CATTIVONE

replace the text of rule 127/0 with the following NELLALISTA delimited text
NELLALISTA
When a Call for Judgement has been made, the administrator shall randomly
select one player among the eligible players to be the judge. Eligble
players for the purpose of this rule are all players but the defendant, the
plaintiff and players in the List of Misbehaving Judges. If that leaves no
players eligible to be the judge, all players are eligible.
NELLALISTA
</proposal>

Antonio
--
Rivoluzione:
  \o_  (o      __)   ( /    |__     o_  _o/
   |   /\  __\o  \o   |   o/  o/__  (\   |
  / \ |\  /) |   ( \ /o) / |  (  (\  /| / \

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com