spoon-business: Calls for Judgement

[Jörg Rathlev <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I make the following Calls for Judgement:

\begin{CFJ}
The score of the player named uniquely identifying names is 577.
\end{CFJ}

\begin{CFJ}
The score of the player named Joerg is 562. The score of the player
who joined the game as "Jesus" is 996.
\end{CFJ}

Note that I made two different CFJs because uin set both his score and
created points, while Jesus/Jebus and me just set our scores.


\begin{CFJ}
The name of the player who joined as "Jesus" is now "Jebus".
\end{CFJ}

\begin{CFJ}
No rule 235/0 ever existed. The rule entitled "Statute of Limitation"
still exists.
\end{CFJ}

This will hopefully clear up all the things that are currently unclear
about the game state.


I also make the following proposal:

\begin{proposal}
\title{Correct our scores, please}

The score of the player named Joerg is set to 39.

The score of the player named uniquely identifying names is set to 54,
plus or minus any scoring for proposals that were voted on in nweek 2
and passed or failed before this proposal took effect.

The score of the player named Jesus or Jebus is set to 0.

\end{proposal}


Joerg