Joel Uckelman on Sat, 2 Jun 2007 09:56:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07 |
Thus spake "J.J. Young": > Yes, but... > > 10.3.1.1 MINOR COUNTRY ACCESS: Any major power may move forces and trace > supply through a neutral minor country. A major power may not also build > depots and/or occupy cities in a minor country unless that major power is at > war with or controls that minor country. > > So I figured a fleet counted as "forces" and could move there. But I > suppose it's a question whether the use of a port involves "occupying" the > city. What does everyone think ? I didn't mean to hold things up with a > lengthy rules discussion. > > -JJY Here's the relevant bit of 6.2.1.2, in the naval section: "A fleet(s) may enter a port controlled by another major power or neutral minor country only to attack a fleet(s) there or with the controlling major power's permission, even if the port city has no garrison." So, I think this isn't legal. -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia