Mel Chin on Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:35:49 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07


That's what I thought also. Fleets can't enter neutral ports.

Mel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07


> Thus spake "J.J. Young":
> > Yes, but...
> >
> > 10.3.1.1 MINOR COUNTRY ACCESS: Any major power may move forces and trace
> > supply through a neutral minor country. A major power may not also build
> > depots and/or occupy cities in a minor country unless that major power
is at
> > war with or controls that minor country.
> >
> > So I figured a fleet counted as "forces" and could move there.  But I
> > suppose it's a question whether the use of a port involves "occupying"
the
> > city.  What does everyone think ?  I didn't mean to hold things up with
a
> > lengthy rules discussion.
> >
> > -JJY
>
> Here's the relevant bit of 6.2.1.2, in the naval section:
>
> "A fleet(s) may enter a port controlled by another major power or neutral
> minor country only to attack a fleet(s) there or with the controlling
major
> power's permission, even if the port city has no garrison."
>
> So, I think this isn't legal.
>
> -- 
> J.
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia