Mel Chin on Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:35:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07 |
That's what I thought also. Fleets can't enter neutral ports. Mel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07 > Thus spake "J.J. Young": > > Yes, but... > > > > 10.3.1.1 MINOR COUNTRY ACCESS: Any major power may move forces and trace > > supply through a neutral minor country. A major power may not also build > > depots and/or occupy cities in a minor country unless that major power is at > > war with or controls that minor country. > > > > So I figured a fleet counted as "forces" and could move there. But I > > suppose it's a question whether the use of a port involves "occupying" the > > city. What does everyone think ? I didn't mean to hold things up with a > > lengthy rules discussion. > > > > -JJY > > Here's the relevant bit of 6.2.1.2, in the naval section: > > "A fleet(s) may enter a port controlled by another major power or neutral > minor country only to attack a fleet(s) there or with the controlling major > power's permission, even if the port city has no garrison." > > So, I think this isn't legal. > > -- > J. > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia