Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, but...

10.3.1.1 MINOR COUNTRY ACCESS: Any major power may move forces and trace 
supply through a neutral minor country. A major power may not also build 
depots and/or occupy cities in a minor country unless that major power is at 
war with or controls that minor country.

So I figured a fleet counted as "forces" and could move there.  But I 
suppose it's a question whether the use of a port involves "occupying" the 
city.  What does everyone think ?  I didn't mean to hold things up with a 
lengthy rules discussion.

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mel Chin" <mrchin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07


> Isn't Antwerp a neutral port?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 2:04 AM
> Subject: [eia] Russian naval phase, 7/07
>
>
>> I:  hold at Riga
>> II:  English Channel ---> Malmo
>> III:  English Channel ---> Antwerp
>> Sweden:  Gibraltar ---> S of Corfu
>>
>> For the Motherland !
>> -JJY
>> _______________________________________________
>> eia mailing list
>> eia@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> 


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia