James Helle on Sat, 20 May 2006 23:42:23 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Birmingham results |
You're right. I was looking at my force which, at one point, was 6I and 1G and so I had these numbers in my head when I was writing that. -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Gorman Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 9:14 PM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] Birmingham results At 12:46 PM 5/20/2006, you wrote: >Well, Ney came within .1 morale of breaking the British. However, the >British rallied around their flag in round 3 and really gave 'em hell. >Casualties are 3 British and 2 French. > >AS I understand the rules the French have no valid place to retreat to and >thus are captured IAW 7.5.10.3.6. Henceforth Ney, 6I and 1C are POW's. There's no reason why I would take both casualties as cavalry so the remaining force would be 5I and 2C _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia