Re: [eia] Birmingham results

Michael Gorman on Sat, 20 May 2006 23:13:50 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Birmingham results

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] Birmingham results
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 23:13:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <NFEPLOEKBOBJNBDJKIGEEELGCHAA.jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <NFEPLOEKBOBJNBDJKIGEEELGCHAA.jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

At 12:46 PM 5/20/2006, you wrote:
>Well, Ney came within .1 morale of breaking the British.  However, the
>British rallied around their flag in round 3 and really gave 'em hell.
>Casualties are 3 British and 2 French.
>
>AS I understand the rules the French have no valid place to retreat to and
>thus are captured IAW 7.5.10.3.6.  Henceforth Ney, 6I and 1C are POW's.
There's no reason why I would take both casualties as cavalry so the 
remaining force would be 5I and 2C 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] Birmingham results
  - From: James Helle

References:
- [eia] Birmingham results
  - From: James Helle

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] Russian naval phase, 2/06
Next by Date: Re: [eia] Birmingham results
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] Birmingham results
Next by thread: Re: [eia] Birmingham results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread