James Helle on Sat, 20 May 2006 23:46:41 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[eia] retreat results |
Quoting Mike: I'm inclined to say that since the victor chooses the retreat path, he can validly choose a path that pins my army against the arrow and forces surrender. He could choose to retreat me to Portsmouth, but he is not required to do so. So he can retreat me to London and then the SE of London leaving my clear retreat path to be across the arrow. I would also see it as reasonable for him to choose to retreat me to London and then to Portsmouth if he felt so inclined, but I don't see that he is required to do so. Mike, if you agree that pinning the French army against a crossing arrow and forcing a surrender is a valid option then that is what I would choose to do. That was my purpose for specifying that a depot garrison existed and placing a corps SE of London. However, if you dispute this is a legal maneuver I will choose a different retreat route. Do we feel a vote is in order since this could set a precedent? _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia