Michael Gorman on Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:31:50 -0400 (EDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Field Batle at Hull-Allied Round 2 |
At 10:15 AM 4/9/2006, you wrote: >Thus spake Michael Gorman: > > At 10:00 AM 4/9/2006, you wrote: > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >Hash: SHA1 > > > > > >Dice rolls requested by: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >Rolls sent to: > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > ># combat on 2-3 w/ 21 factors, no drm > > > > > >No. of sides on every die: 6 > > >No. of dice for every roll: 1 > > >No. of dice rolls requested: 1 > > >No. of rolls per line: 1 > > > > > > 1 > > > > > Wow, that's 6 consecutive 1's. If I wasn't rolling something pretty close > > to a standard distribution of rolls I'd start seriously worrying that > > Joel's roll program had broken. > >All of my tests in the past have been on big blocks of rolls, returned >all at once. I'm going to do something similar with a large number of >requests for single rolls, and see what I get. I was feeling despondent in the early game and started spreadsheeting my rolls. No differentiation for one roll or multiple roll requests but with 59 recorded rolls I have an average of 3.42. My most common result has been 1 with 13 instances but my next most common numbers are 4 and 6 with 12 and 10 instances. So I've had no indications that the roller is at fault. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia