Re: [eia] Amended political orders

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm.  I had thought having any enemy forces inside the home nation borders
removed all the restrictions on suing for peace, but I see now that I was
wrong.  And my opinion is that Prussia's corps in Flanders does not count as
being "within the suing home nation's borders"; I think the intention is
that home nation borders only were meant.

However, no restrictions exist on offering informal peace.  Assuming Prussia
accepted, Mike would lose out on 5 PPs, enforced peace, and victory
conditions, but it would still be a legal way of accomplishing what Jim
obviously intended.  France suing Britain for peace was legal.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 1:49 AM
Subject: RE: [eia] Amended political orders


> At 08:44 PM 2/24/2005, you wrote:
> >I'm confused; doesn't rule 4.4.2.1, which states "A major power may not
> >sue for peace to another major power that does not have forces within
> >the suing home nation's borders unless, at the same time, it sues for
> >peace to _all_ major powers with which it is at war." mean that since
> >Prussia doesn't have forces within France, Jim can't sue Mike for peace
> >without also suing me?
>
> Prussia has forces at Brussels, which is one space into French territory.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia