RE: [eia] Amended political orders

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

France has decided it will follow through with its surrender to G.B. and
will offer Prussia an informal peace, which Mike has privately stated he
would accept.  (Sorry, Mike, if it sounds as though I'm speaking for you).
JJ, since you are the only one who can impose peace terms, do you have any
other demands?

Will the issue of access prevent us from commencing repatriation, if it's
desired?


-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
J.J. Young
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:17 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] Amended political orders


Regardless of what is decided about Jim granting access this turn, I'll take
his request as a sign that France accepts unconditional surrender to Great
Britain and Prussia.

Britain chooses C.6 (the removal of Napoleon) as its first victory
condition.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 7:42 PM
Subject: [eia] Amended political orders


> I am not 100% sure what the consensus is for changing political orders.  I
> generally oppose it, but if there is good precedent for doing this I will
> change my political orders to grant access to G.B. and Prussia. However, I
> will leave this for the group to decide.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia