RE: [eia] Amended political orders

["Nate Ellefson" <nellefson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm confused; doesn't rule 4.4.2.1, which states "A major power may not
sue for peace to another major power that does not have forces within
the suing home nation's borders unless, at the same time, it sues for
peace to _all_ major powers with which it is at war." mean that since
Prussia doesn't have forces within France, Jim can't sue Mike for peace
without also suing me?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of J.J. Young
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 8:17 PM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: Re: [eia] Amended political orders
> 
> 
> Regardless of what is decided about Jim granting access this 
> turn, I'll take his request as a sign that France accepts 
> unconditional surrender to Great Britain and Prussia.
> 
> Britain chooses C.6 (the removal of Napoleon) as its first 
> victory condition.
> 
> -JJY
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 7:42 PM
> Subject: [eia] Amended political orders
> 
> 
> > I am not 100% sure what the consensus is for changing political 
> > orders.  I generally oppose it, but if there is good precedent for 
> > doing this I will change my political orders to grant 
> access to G.B. 
> > and Prussia. However, I will leave this for the group to decide.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia