Re: [eia] EiH language on siege combat resolution

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>]

At 08:59 PM 11/24/2004, you wrote:
>     Here is what EiH has to say about siege combat resolution:
>
> ·         If the besieger loses or does not win (break or eliminate the 
> defenders) within three rounds, the siege is resumed, with no further 
> combat this Major Power sequence.
>
> ·         If the besieger wins (the defender is eliminated or broken with 
> the attacker unbroken), then the city is captured and all surviving 
> defending army factors and leaders are surrendered.
>
>
>
> As you can see, they changed the wording so that it specifies that the 
> besieger only wins if the attacker remains unbroken. Apparently they 
> thought that the wording in the EiA rules that Jim is referring to was a 
> mistake.

The language here is a lot clearer and consistent with how we've been 
playing and assigning political points.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia