Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806

Michael Gorman on Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:38:05 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:37:55 -0600
In-reply-to: <000e01c4c5c7$c8832c20$0a288304@hppav>
References: <000d01c4c594$309613b0$9bb1e004@hppav> <6.1.0.6.0.20041108124938.01aacbc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <000e01c4c5c7$c8832c20$0a288304@hppav>

At 01:18 PM 11/8/2004, you wrote:

Is there a rule stating that an undergarrisoned defender may not sortie, or
is this simply your preference Mike?  I'm only asking because I couldn't
find such a rule.

Regarding the depot at Magdeburg, the French corps previously besieging
Magdeburg will hold and maintain the siege.  I will send out rolls for both
Magdeburg and Berlin.


That resolves that issue then.  I'll send out the Saxon sortie as well.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

References:
- [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
  - From: James Helle
- Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
  - From: Michael Gorman
- Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
  - From: James Helle

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
Next by Date: Re: [eia] French siege rolls, 2nd round- Apr. 1806
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
Next by thread: Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread