Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Is there a rule stating that an undergarrisoned defender may not sortie, or
is this simply your preference Mike?  I'm only asking because I couldn't
find such a rule.

Regarding the depot at Magdeburg, the French corps previously besieging
Magdeburg will hold and maintain the siege.  I will send out rolls for both
Magdeburg and Berlin.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] French land phase- Apr. 1806


> At 07:09 AM 11/8/2004, you wrote:
> >Depots created: Magdeburg, Leipzig, Poitiers  ($3)
> >Depots removed: Bordeaux, Hanover
> >
> >HC in Hamburg--> Leipzig  ($1, Magdeburg)
> >1 I in Lubeck --> Berlin  (F 3-)
> >1 I in Lubeck holds and maintains siege  (F 3-)
> >2 I in Bayonne --> Poitiers  ($1, Poitiers)
> >2 I W/o Zurich --> Zurich  (F 7-, 6- respectively)
> >6 I in Kustrin --> Dresden  ($8, Magdeburg & Leipzig)
> >1 I in Magdeburg --> Dresden  (F 4-)
> >1 I in Leipzig --> Dresden  ( F 6-)
> >
> >Total cost $13
> >
> >Mike, do the corps at Berlin wish to fall back to the city?
>
> Since the corps attacking Berlin is foraging the issue with the Magdeburg
> depot doesn't matter, so the corps at Berlin will retire into the city.
>
> The Lubeck corps can't sortie since they are undergarrisoned but the Saxon
> corps can and will do so.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia