Nate Ellefson on Sat, 31 Jul 2004 12:48:08 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] Nelson/Napoleon |
> I had always taken PP to be an aggregate of factors external > and internal; > I don't see them as solely outward-facing. I don't think the foreign commander bonus makes sense internally, either. If anything, government and the press tend to create national heroes and emphasize the ways in which they contributed to the overall success, often downplaying the accomplishments of a foreign commander who happens to be in supreme command. I think jealousy tends to be the more typical result. In WWII the British went to great lenghts to glorify the largely undeserving Montgomery to salve their national pride. In WWI the hero in the US was Pershing, but he was by no stretch of the imagination one of the archetects of the Entante's victory. I'm going well beyond the scope of what is probably appropriate for discussion in the public board, so maybe Joel and I should continue this thread in private. :) _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia