RE: [eia] French leaders

["Nate Ellefson" <nellefson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd be entirely fine with Jim removing the French leaders.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of James Helle
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:25 PM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: Re: [eia] French leaders
> 
> 
> Hmmm.  Ok, after reading 4.6.5.2 I am convinced that the 
> French leaders are ineligible to participate in the 
> Christiana battle.  Sorry Mike, I realize this is the same 
> rule you pointed out earlier but I apparently didn't grasp 
> the significance of it before.  In light of this ruling, is 
> anyone opposed to me removing the French leaders from the 
> board?  Obviously, if they can't participate then there was 
> no point in placing them there. JRH
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nate Ellefson" <nellefson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'public list for an Empires in Arms game'" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:28 PM
> Subject: RE: [eia] French leaders
> 
> 
> > >From this FAQ EiA webpage, http://eia.xnetz.com/rules/eiafaq.txt:
> >
> > *****
> > 4.4.6.5.2 If a major power gains control of a minor via a 
> declaration 
> > of war, but does not declare war on the invader, can the 
> controlling 
> > power's leaders be sent to lead minor troops?
> >
> > According to 4.4.6.5.2, "If it is not at war...the minor 
> country must 
> > be run using only the minor country's own forces,..."  
> Therefore, no.
> > *****
> >
> > I'd agree that France's leaders shouldn't be able to 
> command in this 
> > situation.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> > > Of James Helle
> 
> > > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 7:41 AM
> > > To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> > > Subject: [eia] French leaders
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems like we need a consensus on whether the French 
> leaders can 
> > > participate in the Christiana battle or not before Mike 
> can proceed 
> > > with his land phase.  So far it seems like myself and possibly JJ 
> > > and Kyle are in support of using them with Mike opposed.  
> If anyone 
> > > else has an opinion please feel free to express it.
> > > JRH
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia