Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle of Florence, October 1807

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not Florence, Turin, of course.

BTW, I assume that the garrison/PP issue, at least for a victory, is
resolved and that Austria, Britain, and Turkey each gain +1 PP for the
relief of Florence ?

On the question of whether a garrison-only owner should lose PPs in the
event of a defeat, we seem to have 3 (Kyle, J.J., Jim) who say that he
should lose PPs, and 1 so far (Joel) who says he should not lose any.
Please correct and excuse me if I have misrepresented anyone.  What do the
rest of you (Everett, Danny, Mike) think about it ?

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle of Florence, October 1807


> Kyle, did you say how many factors were detatched into Florence ?  Sorry
if
> I missed it.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle of Florence, October 1807
>
>
> >     I thought that was in there somewhere.  Thanks for finding it.  Yes,
> it
> > was my stated intention to detach a garrison if the rules permitted it.
> So
> > I will go ahead and do so.
> >     Battle of Turin is up next.
> >
> > kdh
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:12 AM
> > Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle of Florence, October 1807
> >
> >
> > > > I wish Everett and Joel could have entered their opinions about PPs
> for
> > > > garrisons in a field combat before this point, so that it wouldn't
> look
> > like
> > > > Coalition aggrandizment if they agreed with my side.  But as I said,
> it
> > > > wouldn't have affected my decision to have the Florence garrison in
> the
> > > > battle.  In any case, though, the decision needs to be finalized
> > > > immediately.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't have a strong preference for either way.  However, since there
> > > are  some situations where factors outside of corp can gain PP (Seiges
> > > of fortresses), I'd have to slightly side on the side that they do
> > > gain/lose PP.
> > >
> > > Also, while looking at the rules while trying to decide, I found
> > > 7.5.1.3: "After a combat . . .player's forces may . . . detach factors
> > > to occupy . . . vacant city"  So, if Kyle wants to detach factors at
> > > Turin, I say he should be able to.  (I probably would have still used
my
> > > unused movement for foraging and given up ability to siege anyway)
> > >
> > > -Everett
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia