Re: [eia] the invasion depot issue

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry if I misunderstood or misrepresented.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:27 AM
Subject: RE: [eia] the invasion depot issue


> Actually, my statement was that I was unfamiliar with the naval rules as I
> do not have or use a navy.  However, I am opposed to placing the depot of
> one power on the fleet of another power.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> J.J. Young
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 5:29 PM
> To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [eia] the invasion depot issue
>
>
> It seems like most of the group (myself, Kyle, Danny, and probably Mike)
are
> against a loose interpretation of the invasion supply depot rules,
prefering
> that they be restricted to only fleets controlled by the power placing the
> depot.  Everett has said he is undecided, and Jim told Kyle and I that he
> prefers to stay out of it, since he has very little involvement in naval
> affairs.
>
> So it seems to me that the issue is pretty much settled, and Turkey will
> have to revise its orders (sorry, Joel).  I think the best way to get
things
> moving again is for Turkey to go ahead with its revisions, and then there
> will be nothing holding Spain back from taking its turn.
>
> -JJY
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia