RE: [eia] the invasion depot issue

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, my statement was that I was unfamiliar with the naval rules as I
do not have or use a navy.  However, I am opposed to placing the depot of
one power on the fleet of another power.

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
J.J. Young
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 5:29 PM
To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eia] the invasion depot issue


It seems like most of the group (myself, Kyle, Danny, and probably Mike) are
against a loose interpretation of the invasion supply depot rules, prefering
that they be restricted to only fleets controlled by the power placing the
depot.  Everett has said he is undecided, and Jim told Kyle and I that he
prefers to stay out of it, since he has very little involvement in naval
affairs.

So it seems to me that the issue is pretty much settled, and Turkey will
have to revise its orders (sorry, Joel).  I think the best way to get things
moving again is for Turkey to go ahead with its revisions, and then there
will be nothing holding Spain back from taking its turn.

-JJY
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia