Re: [eia] Turkish Land Phase, August 1807

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> At 02:39 PM 11/14/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> >    I agree with JJ whole-heartedly on this issue.  The fact that the 
> > designers never mentioned a
> >restriction as simple as not placing depots on your enemy's fleets 
> >demonstrates to me fairly
> >decisively that the designers never even considered the option of building 
> >invasion supply depots
> >on another power's fleets.  So my vote is an emphatic no.
> >    In general, if there is a situation where the rules are unclear, I 
> > hope we would all try to bring up
> >that potential rules dispute *before* it is to be exploited.  I think this 
> >just makes for a smoother
> >game in general.  I hope everyone else agrees.
> >
> >kdh
> 
> The one problem is that you have to see it as a possibly objectionable rule 
> before someone objects.  There have been plenty of arguments over what 
> rules mean made here that I never would have thought of before someone made 
> them.
> 
> Mike

Right. It had not occurred to me that placing a depot with the Venetian fleet would be controversial. I'd been planning to do so since just before the July movement phase.


-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia