[eia] allow me to muddy the waters even more

[Jerald Jeffrey Young (CPS - Personal) <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

What about using repatriation, but with the former enemy having some sort of a 
say in where his troops are transported to along the border ?  I have no 
thoughts yet about details, but maybe as a general framework, this could yeild 
a result not as displeasing to everyone ?

-JJY


Quoting Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> At 01:15 PM 10/9/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >I'm worried that our 2 choices are either a 4-3 vote in favor of
> repatriation
> >(which makes all of us somewhat unhappy), or a 4-3 vote in favor of limited
> >access with at least restriction #2 below, and possibly #3 and #4, as well
> >(which will leave 3 of us very unhappy).  Which is the better choice ?
> >
> >-JJY
> I expect we'll come to some sort of temporary solution like we did last 
> time and then take another stab at it the next time it'd be nice to have 
> limited access.  By the end of the game, we might actually have figured out 
> a good compromise that works. :)
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia