Michael Gorman on 31 Aug 2003 19:39:29 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Retreating the Denmark corps |
At 11:46 AM 8/31/2003 -0400, you wrote:
This is also how a force can be eliminated by retreat. If every space up to the crossing arrow was occupied by a non-depot garrison force, the Denmark corps would have been eliminated.> The depot in London is closer to Brest (by land spaces) than the depot in > San Sebastian. > Ah... After you pointed it out, I was wondering whether it made sense that you could be retreated toward London even though you couldn't be retreated there (because you can't be retreated over a crossing arrow). But then I realized that getting there isn't the important thing. The important thing is whether you can still receive supply. Since you can still receive supply across a crossing arrow, being retreated in the direction of London still makes good sense. (Or at least it *would* have if there weren't a closer depot to retreat to.) kdh
Mike _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia