Danny Mount on 27 Aug 2003 21:22:00 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] Austrian Land Phase |
For all purposes, this movement was during the time-period that Spain was in "Limbo" between its past and present owner. I suppose if I announced that Austria had access to Lombardy then it was because an agreement had already been made in the past with the former owner of Spain and I felt like I needed to honor what pact had already been made. As for now, if it means to JJ that Spain is altering anything then I guess that is the case. But I state again that my intention was for Spain's homeland to be the access, so I do not see it as an alteration. Danny -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of J.J. Young Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:56 PM To: eia@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Fw: [eia] Austrian Land Phase Actually, I have now found an example where Austria moved troops into and through Lombardy (which was then Spanish-controlled) in April of 1805. The relevant corps moved from Turin ---> Milan ---> Mantua. Austria apparently felt at the time that they had access to move through Spanish territory outside of the home nation. Spain made no objection at the time. So what I want to know is, was the Spanish access statement of May, '05 intended to _scale_back_ some of the access that had existed previously ? In other words, that the allies who had previously had access to all Spanish-controlled territories, now only had access to the home nation ? I find it hard to get this from "Spain grants unlimited access". I know I'm badgering, and I'm sorry. My only point is that it's impossible, from my perspective, that this is a misunderstanding. Of course Spain has the right to change its access agreements as it chooses, within the rules. But I am firmly convinced that Great Britain has had access to Languedoc up until now, and if Spain wants to alter this, then it is a new change which they must decide upon _now_, in May of 1807. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "EiA List" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 2:46 AM Subject: [eia] Austrian Land Phase > The battered remains of the Austrian army move thusly: > > I at Eszek => Peterwardein . (A) > I at Trieste => Gratz => ne (ending between Ofen and Vienna) (A) > I at Trieste leaves 1 garrison factor => Gratz => Vienna, dropping off 1 additional garrison factor (for a total of 6) (A) > I with John at Linz => Vienna (A) > I at Salzberg leaves 1 garrison factor => Linz, leaves 1 garrison factor => Vienna (.5) > C at Venice => Trieste => Gratz => Vienna (.5) > C w/Charles at Turin => Milan => e => Mantua => Venice (A) > C at Turin => Milan => e => Mantua => Venice (A) > I at Turin => Milan => e => Mantua (A) > I at Turin => Milan, picking up garrison => e => Mantua (5-) > > > Total cost: $1 > Forage roll for Mantua I (5-) coming up. > - > Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia