J.J. Young on 5 Aug 2003 18:01:51 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase, 2/07 |
The definition of "garrison" for a besieged city comes into play for paid supply, and also for besieged forage rolls. We already had a lengthy rules discussion back in the first months of the game about whether each corps, and the "garrison" factors not in a corps, should each roll separately for besieged forage. That was what I argued at the time, but the group decided against me, that there should be only one forage roll for all the factors in a besieged city. It seems to me that the same principle is the issue here. Do all the factors in a besieged city count as one city garrison for paid supply/forage roll, or do you have to make multiple forage rolls or pay supply separately for each corps/garrison ? -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:46 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase, 2/07 > Thus spake "J.J. Young": > > Not that it makes a difference to Spain's total cost for the turn, but does > > it cost just $0.5 to supply all the forces in a besieged city, or does it > > cost a separate $0.5 for each corps, and for the 1 M garrison ? > > > > I guess I'm asking what we decided the definition of "garrison" is. Is it > > all of the forces inside a besieged city, or just the factors not in a corps > > ? > > > > -JJY > > If my memory serves me, corps aren't referred to as garrisons anywhere in > the rules. Besides, being besieged shouldn't reduce the cost for supply. > > -- > J. > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia