J.J. Young on 5 Aug 2003 18:01:51 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase, 2/07


The definition of "garrison" for a besieged city comes into play for paid
supply, and also for besieged forage rolls.  We already had a lengthy rules
discussion back in the first months of the game about whether each corps,
and the "garrison" factors not in a corps, should each roll separately for
besieged forage.  That was what I argued at the time, but the group decided
against me, that there should be only one forage roll for all the factors in
a besieged city.

It seems to me that the same principle is the issue here.  Do all the
factors in a besieged city count as one city garrison for paid supply/forage
roll, or do you have to make multiple forage rolls or pay supply separately
for each corps/garrison ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase, 2/07


> Thus spake "J.J. Young":
> > Not that it makes a difference to Spain's total cost for the turn, but
does
> > it cost just $0.5 to supply all the forces in a besieged city, or does
it
> > cost a separate $0.5 for each corps, and for the 1 M garrison ?
> >
> > I guess I'm asking what we decided the definition of "garrison" is.  Is
it
> > all of the forces inside a besieged city, or just the factors not in a
corps
> > ?
> >
> > -JJY
>
> If my memory serves me, corps aren't referred to as garrisons anywhere in
> the rules. Besides, being besieged shouldn't reduce the cost for supply.
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia