Re: [eia] conquering the Kingdom of the 2 Sicilies

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    I was reading that rule to mean something different, but now I see how
it could apply to this situation.  I agree with Joel, Spain would not lose
control of Sicily.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] conquering the Kingdom of the 2 Sicilies


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >
> >     Hello all.  Yesterday, JJ alerted me to the fact that there may be a
=
> > disagreement regarding what would happen if Turkey were to conquer =
> > Naples.  After consulting 10.4 and 11.7, it is my opinion that if Turkey
=
> > were to conquer Naples, Turkey would gain control of the entire Kingdom
=
> > of the 2 Sicilies (both Naples and Sicily).  However, if Spanish troops
=
> > remain in Palermo unbesieged, then Sicily would revert to Spanish =
> > control at the end of the following turn.  (So there would be only one =
> > turn during which Sicily was officially under Turkish control.)
> >
> >     Does anyone disagree with that interpretation?
> >
> > kdh
>
> I do. I think Spain would have continuous control of Sicily, due to
> 10.4.3.1:
>
> "The control of a secondary district is not given to the controller of the
> major district if a secondary district is already controlled by a
different
> major power."
>
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia