Re: [eia] B.7

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

This interpretation would be OK with me for B7, but since it is the _victor_
who chooses in C4, I don't think the choice should be restricted in the same
way (in other words, change B7, but leave C4 as written).  Not that Everett
was even suggesting that we should.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 4:49 PM
Subject: [eia] B.7


>     I have no problem with this interpretation of B.7.  Any objections?
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 3:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] more 12.4
>
>
> > I also think that we should interpret victory condition B.7. such that a
> province adjacent to the victor's territory must be chosen, and if none
> > exist, only then a territory that contains a victors corp may be chosen.
> > This way, if it is a possibility to have a corp isolated this way, the
> > victor would know that before hand, and it would be part of the
> > consequence that he would have to consider and live with when choosing
> > that condition.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia