Re: [eia] I still have a problem

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    So at this point we seem to be split right down the middle on this
issue.  JJ, Danny, and I are for having eligible corps on the map at the
time of the declaration.  Mike, Everett, and Joel are for simply having the
potential to produce a corps that could be placed in a position to make it
eligible to attack.  I guess it's up to you Jim.  Which ruling do you
prefer?

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Mount" <mount.23@xxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: RE: [eia] I still have a problem


> For my two sense, I agree with Mike that we should contact each other
before
> Political Orders are sent in so we don't get into an endless loop of on
> again off again.
>
> As for the Declaration of War, I agree with JJ that our forces should
> already be on the map.  Again, I made the mistake of thinking that my
fleet
> could go to a city and pick up a corps and then move again.  My mistake.
>
> -DEM
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Michael Gorman
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 12:54 AM
> To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [eia] I still have a problem
>
>
> At 06:21 PM 3/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >     Again, I don't care much about this and am willing to concede.  If
you
> >guys want to do combined movement separate from the escrow, I can live
with
> >that.
> >
> >kdh
>
> I'm not entirely comfortable with the us too email, nor am I happy with
> requiring Austria to combine with everyone Prussia combines with in order
> to combine with Prussia.  That Prussia didn't offer to combine with
Austria
> and has stated he meant to do that makes the current turn less important
to
> me but I very much wanted Prussia and Austria to make their decision
> without knowing if I was combined with France.  If they can alter their
> combined movement phase after knowing mine, then I would want to be able
to
> alter mine after they alter theirs which in turn should allow them to
alter
> theirs after I alter mine in response to them altering theirs and so
> on.  We can get into an endless recursion of combined movement phases if
> the results of knowing what someone else is doing will alter what you do.
>
> In this turn, if Austria and Prussia are not combined, I want to combine
> with France.  If they are combined, I have to really think about it.  I
> took a shot at hoping Austria wouldn't risk going into instability and
> getting potentially screwed in an economic phase and would wait a turn to
> declare war.  They didn't wait, but their lack of combined movement is
very
> important to me.  If they can alter that after declaration, then I want to
> be able to respond to that alteration and cannot really say they can't
> respond in kind.  So, depending on what their plans are, combined movement
> phase will continue forever if we allow changes after revealing
declaration.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia