Joel Uckelman on 29 Mar 2003 15:02:00 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] NOT On to the Reinforcement Phase! |
Thus spake "Everett E. Proctor": > > > Could you please explain your reasoning for this recommendation? > > Easily, because: > > "I *wish* we were playing in the sort of gentlemanly game > where a spirit of generosity prevailed and players allowed each other to go > back and fix obvious mistakes. But unfortunately that's not what this group > seems to prefer. " > > Also, more seriously, if I keep on saying that X's orders won't affect > what I do, so I'll send mine out in advance, and then at some future > month I suddenly declare that I do need to wait for X's orders, I may be > revealing more than I want to. > > -Everett I had thought about that, but it occurred to me that no one would be able to tell the difference between a) my delay because I want to see what someone does, and b) my delay because I'm too busy to move right then. -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia