jjy on 28 Mar 2003 20:23:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] [escrow] Political Phase, September 1805 |
> No, we don't allow them to add that in. No need to be upset, Mike. My only point was that I didn't know how to handle the situation. > I will reiterate that I would prefer to see Spain list the nations it > combines with rather than use coalition as that name has no meaning in the > game rules. As one of the parties not privy to the internal relations of > the coalition, you guys could add someone in or kick someone out and I > wouldn't be able to tell from just that term that its meaning had changed. OK. > Otherwise, since everyone involved is combined with Spain, all the land > movements will occur at the Spanish place in the movement order. Great Britain also declared combined movement with everyone concerned, and was declared by everyone. How does this change things ? > As there > is combined movement, we will go through the long chain of rules to 'make > combined movement clear'. The first one is that the combined powers must > choose an order of movement or dice off if no consensus can be reached. I > would say that as there are two groups linked by Spain, Spain would get to > choose which group it will move with, or roll randomly if undecided, and > then the two groups would dice off to see who goes first since they aren't > linked into a single combined movement group and therefore are not in > consensus with each other. Group one follows all the combined movement > steps and resolves its battles and then group two follows the steps and > resolves theirs. Sounds good. My only question is the one above. -JJY _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia