Re: [eia] St. Petersburg siege

[jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx]

That's what I had thought, before Ragnar's response.  How does everyone want to 
handle this ?

-JJY

Quoting Kyle H <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> > This is different from what we (or at least I) had decided.  I had thought
> that
> > although both non-combined besiegers would get separate attempts to
> breach,
> > if/when a breach is made the phasing besieger would only get to use his
> own
> > forces.  What Ragnar is saying seems to be that both besiegers get
> separate
> > rolls, and then all of the besieging forces, phasing and non-phasing, get
> to
> > participate in the battle.  Is this what we wnat to do ?  This throws the
> > advantage firmly to the besieging side in these situations.
> >
> 
>     I didn't realize that's what Ragnar was saying, but I guess you're
> right.  Personally, I don't think it makes sense.  If GB and Spain get 2
> siege attempts, they should not get to combine their forces for each
> attempt.  That seems just wrong to me.  If you get twice as many attempts,
> each attempt should be made with (roughly) half as much force.  Doesn't that
> make sense?
> 
> kdh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia