Kyle H on 24 Dec 2002 10:47:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[eia] St. Petersburg siege |
Hi guys. Back when we
weren't sure how to handle the St. Petersburg siege, I sent a question to the
EiH list, just to see what they'd say. I got one pertinent reply from a
guru. I think that in the mean time, JJ and Mike have already agreed about
all the things that Ragnar says in the email below. But just in case he
says anything useful that you haven't thought of on your own, I'll include the
text below anyway.
kdh
--Ragnar wrote:--
Kyle,
Siegecombat is weird at times. Technically, it's even possible that 2 powers that are not at war are obliged to fight each other in a siege. The rules in classic EiA on when a siege is lifted, started, etc, are equally vague. Hence there is no definative awnser to your question. However, failing that, there seems to be no rule from _preventing_ the same besieging force to essentially roll twice for a breach, if the besiegers are made up of 2 different powers each acting during their own phase. Siegecombat is fought between defenders and besiegers (not attackers and defenders!), no matter what they are doing there or when they are doing it. So: A) As long as there is at least 1 corps remaining that declared a siege during its last land phase, a city remains besieged. Note that it is not possible to besiege a city with part of a force, all your corps in the area have to besiege (or not) and if combining that goes for all powers combined with you as well. B) A power owning a corps can attempt a breach if it's besieging during the siege combat step of it's land phase. If powers combine, there's only 1 land phase and 1 breach attempt, if they don't, they each get their shot during each of their phases (even though that sucks, IMO). If either has success, everyone that is part of the siege fights, simply because they're there. C) Siege relief combat is triggered by units outside the city entering the area. In EiH it's only a corps, but iirc, in EiA a cossack could do it as well. A siege relief combat is a limited field combat which is, basically, still a field combat. Even though they are besieging, the Br/Sp forces are still field forces in that area. I think here the procedure of 7.3.8 can be applied without problem. best, Ragnar --- In eih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Kyle <polysorbate80@xxxx>" <polysorbate80@xxxx> wrote: > Here's the situation: last turn Britain and Spain used combined > movement and laid siege to St. Petersburg (but did not break > through). > Here are the questions: suppose that Britain and Spain do *not* > use combined movement this turn. > A) Would the siege have to be lifted altogether, and if so, when > would it stop? > B) If it doesn't have to lifted, which nation (either or both?) gets > to attempt a breach? > C) How would a relief battle be fought if the Russian army returned > to the area ? > |