Re: [eia] Spanish I fleet orders?

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It would be great for me if GB could indeed choose whether or not to move
with her combined allies during the naval phase, but still get to move with
them in the land phase, but in my heart I don't believe it.  Kyle, I
recommend that you consult the EiH bigwigs on this one.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Spanish I fleet orders?


> Thus spake "Kyle Haidet":
> >
> >    4.9 says that all allies using combined movement move with the ally
that w
> > ould move last in the phase.  But that rule doesn't say that France (or
GB fo
> > r that matter) has to give up its choice of when it would go in the land
(nav
> > al) phase.  That's the rule that I want to find.
> >
> > kdh
> >
>
> Now that I've done a search on the rules for the word "combined" and found
> no restrictions on France deciding when in the Land Phase to move, I've
> concluded that you've found one of the benefits of combined movement. It
> appears to me that in the current situation, France gets to decide whether
> France and Russia move before or after Britain, Turkey, and Spain by
putting
> France's land phase before or after Spain's.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia