J.J. Young on 19 Nov 2002 23:59:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Battle & seige |
This is perfectly fine with me. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:44 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Battle & seige > Thanks for helping me resolve my concerns about resolving battles with > escrow+pbm. I think you (Mike, Joel, and JJ) have all found acceptable > solutions to my worries about the use of Outflank. Mike and Joel make good > points about withdrawals, though. However, I think this is a small price to > pay for the convenience of the escrow+pbm system. > So, in conclusion, our general procedure for conducting battles will be > as follows (unless the players involved make other arrangements): > > 1. Establish an escrow for chit choice. > 2. If choosing Outflank, list the corps that make up the pinning force and > the corps that make up the flanking force. > 3. Once chits have been revealed and withdrawals have been resolved, reveal > the exact compositions of the pinning and flanking forces (if necessary). > > Pretty simple. Am I missing anything? > > kdh > > > > >This occurred to me when conducting my last battle, and I worried about > it > > >until I realized that there's an easy way to handle Outflank. If you're > > >going to outflank, divide your forces when you make your chit selection. > > >The only situation in which this would reveal more information than > > >resolving a battle in realtime is in the event of a successful > withdrawal, > > >as the reveal forces step is after the withdrawal step. Is this an > > >acceptable solution? > > > > > >-- > > > > I came to the same conclusion as I was also considering an > > outflank in the battle between Russia and Turkey this turn. I had simply > > decided I would tack on my split with the chit choice. To moderate the > > impact should a withdrawal be chosen, I figure you can identify flanking > > and pinning forces by corps rather than give strength details. It still > > reveals information if people have kept up with corps strength, but as > > corps in the same location can exchange forces invisibly every > > reinforcement phase, the information can rapidly become outdated. > > Strength details can then be revealed normally in the reveal > > forces phase. > > Mike > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia