Re: [eia] Economic Phase

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I say, make part of the economic phase escrow, since it can affect actual
troop placement for some countries and only happens every third month, but
leave every month's political phase the way it is, but with the
understanding that a player may revise political steps G, H, and I if
desired, based on the outcome of the Minor Country Control step.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Economic Phase


>     Since Mike is right that all money and manpower that a country might
> receive (without loans) is visible on the board, I have no objection to
> sending out public summaries of those numbers, just so people can
> double-check their own work.  Anything that helps avoid a mistake is a
good
> thing in my book.  And as far as I can tell, there's no rule against doing
> so for anyone who is ambitious enough to give it a try...
>     About steps H-J:  I'm not sure what to think there.  On the one hand,
I
> can see that, while Russia and Turkey are at war, you might want to handle
> the Levy Step simultaneously.  On the other hand, as you know, I'm
generally
> against anything that adds extra steps or extra emails.  Hmmm...
>     Well, I guess the lesson of the past week or so has been not to be so
> caught up in avoiding extra steps.  So sure, if you want we could have two
> Economic Phases.  Economic Phase I would be steps A-G, and each country
> could send in its reports whenever.  Economic Phase II would correspond to
> steps H-J and could be done by escrow.  (BTW, for those who may not know,
> the steps of the economic phase have been lettered on the inside (pg. 2)
of
> the quick reference card.)
>     However, while we are adding sub-phases, I think we should consider
> breaking up the Political Phase as well.  For instance, in the March
> political phase, because I was unaware that war was about to be declared
on
> me, I chose to make Wurttemburg a free state.  If I had been aware of the
> fact that two more countries were about to declare war, I probably
wouldn't
> have made that move.  Hence, I propose breaking up the Political Phase as
> well.  My suggestion would be that steps B-E should be Political Phase I
and
> steps F-I should be Political Phase II.  The first of these steps would
need
> to be done by escrow, the second one wouldn't *have* to be, but it would
> probably still be a good idea.
>     I suppose there is not quite the same need to break up the Political
> Phase as there is to break up the Economic Phase, but I figure that it is
> already essentially broken up anyway, in that we all wait to do the Minor
> Country Control step until after everyone has sent their Political Phase
> orders.  So why not break it up in a way that makes a little more sense,
and
> gives people the information that they should already have when making
> decisions later on in the Political Phase?
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 1:45 AM
> Subject: [eia] Economic Phase
>
>
> > JJ has already said he is going to send out a post with that he
calculates
> > as the trade incomes for each nation.  Do we want to have a post of the
> > money and manpower collection phase?  The numbers are all visible on the
> > map, so anyone who wants to take the time to add up the numbers will
know
> > the income of any other nation.  A posting with what everyone is getting
> > could avoid calculation errors and make sure we all agree on the
> > accounting.  We don't want any WorldCOMs or Enrons in our game!
> > However, if people want to make anyone interested in their economy go do
> > the math themselves, I can get behind that too.
> >
> > As far as the later part of the Economic Phase, like steps H thru J.  Do
> > people want that escrowed?  I can see it being possible that knowing one
> > country is going to cede a minor to another might have an impact on what
> > units you purchase and the ceding step is supposed to occur
simultaneously
> > in face to face games.  I don't think it's big deal and I'm perfectly
> happy
> > to have us just post the public stuff that isn't being centrally
> > determined, like victory points and PSA adjustment, as we figure it
> > out.  However, I think we should decide if we want to have simultaneous
> > release of those later phases or if we just don't think it's going to
> matter.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia