Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 03:04 PM 7/31/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> Yes. 
> Although it was not Everett's intention and so we accomodated him, in a
> similar future situation if any attacking corps ending movement in an
> area is ineligible to lay seige, then no siege can be made at all in that
> area.  
>  
> Question:  (this is a yes-or-no question,
> not meant to spark new debate) is our house rule that when attacking
> corps move into an area with a defending corps, they must stop movement,
> still in effect ?  My understanding is that yes, it still must stop,
> but that laying siege is optional.  Is this correct ? 
>

        Ummm,  you have to stop whenever you enter an area with a corps outside of a city.  I thought that was pretty much figured out.