Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, Jan 1805

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> 
> >
> >1C at Jerusalem => Jaffa (F/auto)
> >2I at Jerusalem with Grand Vizier hold (F/auto)
> >Syrians at Acre hold (F/auto)
>          The two infantry at Jerusalem should forage at four.  3 base+3 for 
> remaining movement-2 for two extra corps in the same area
> 
> Mike

I get 3 (base) + 3 (movement) - 1 (1 other corps in the same area) + 1 (own territory) = 6.

7.4.1.2.1 says one is subtracted for "each other unbesieged corps", not each corps. Though there are two corps at Jerusalem, when considering each there is only one *other* corps at there. Otherwise, a lone corps would suffer a -1 for being in the same space as itself!

Secondly, I take "major power's territory" in 7.4.1.2.5 to mean the same as "territory a major power controls". Had I moved into Georgia, e.g, I would no longer be in my territory, but I Palestine I believe I am. Note that it doesn't say "home territory" or somesuch.


-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia