Re: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!

Olena Bormashenko on 30 Dec 2003 02:26:19 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!

To: "The mailing list of the Christmas Game" <christmasgame@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
From: "Olena Bormashenko" <bormashenko_olena@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:26:19 -0400
References: <3FEFADAA.7945DDC5@xxxxxxx>

Hello everybody

I'm wondering, can I make a rule that requires the rules to be listed in
some sensible order? Right now, if I try to read the ruleset, there are
rules that mention the mirror-state before the definition of mirror-state,
etc... (It's a bit confusing)

Olena B.

_______________________________________________
christmasgame mailing list
christmasgame@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/christmasgame

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
  - From: Alex Fink

References:
- [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
  - From: Alex Fink

Prev by Date: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
Next by Date: Re: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
Previous by thread: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
Next by thread: Re: [TCG] Ferret algorithm change is not in phi!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread