[ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)

Gavin Doughtie on 24 Jun 2003 04:51:01 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)

To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
From: Gavin Doughtie <gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:50:09 -0700
In-reply-to: <20030618230934.21001.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030618230934.21001.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529

Well, log4cplus (http://log4cplus.sourceforge.net/) is almost ready togo into production. Compare/Contrast anyone?


Jon Stewart wrote:

Well, log4cpp is not the most flexible and/or robust system in the world.Great for debugging race conditions, lousy for making your boundschecker-type utility shut up.



_______________________________________________
alacpp mailing list
alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
  - From: Christopher Smith
- Re: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
  - From: Jon Stewart

References:
- Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
  - From: Jon Stewart

Prev by Date: Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
Next by Date: Re: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
Previous by thread: Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
Next by thread: Re: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread