Re: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)

["Jon Stewart" <stew1@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Well, log4cplus (http://log4cplus.sourceforge.net/) is almost ready to 
> go into production. Compare/Contrast anyone?


Interestingly, I just had an email exchange with the log4cplus lead 
developer. I still need to check it out a bit more, but my suspicion is 
that it's lighterweight, perhaps less portable, and has the basic 
features, with maybe fewer options for appenders and configurability.

Also, it has wrapper macros for logging -- which is nice because that's 
what you'd end up doing anyway.

I'm going to download the source and have a look.



Jon
-- 
Jon Stewart
stew1@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
alacpp mailing list
alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp