Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification

Christopher Smith on 19 Jun 2003 22:13:01 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification

To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
From: Christopher Smith <x@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 19 Jun 2003 15:07:26 -0700
In-reply-to: <33584.12.224.171.52.1056045810.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030618230934.21001.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1055986417.2114.76.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33584.12.224.171.52.1056045810.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So, as luck would have it, the CUJ has an online article about that
talks about the Monostate pattern (in the middle):

http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8464/cuj0308dewhurst/

I have to say I'm not sure I see the value in some of the "enhancements"
this guy is talking about, but it's still interesting.

--Chris

_______________________________________________
alacpp mailing list
alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp

References:
- Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
  - From: Jon Stewart
- Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
  - From: Christopher Smith
- Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
  - From: arlo

Prev by Date: Re: [ALACPP] Off-Topic: Broadband in Pasadena?
Next by Date: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
Previous by thread: Re: [ALACPP] Singleton clarification
Next by thread: [ALACPP] log4cplus (was Singleton clarification)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread