Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

He didn't post those actions to a public forum, so the actions wouldn't
take effect even if they were legitimate.
> There is a difference between "permitted unless specifically
> disallowed" and "permitted unless regulated". The rules are clear on
> how consultations can become pondered, on who is the Emergency
> Coordinator, etc. Therefore any changes to a consultation or the
> Emergency Coordinator are regulated and not permitted unless clearly
> defined in the rules. However, the rules are not clear on Refresh
> Proposals. They indicate that Refresh Proposals can be
> submitted/discussed, but they do not indicate any means for doing so.
> Therefore any action involving Refresh Proposals is unregulated. Hence
> why I think your attempt to retract them all might be valid. I suggest
> you retract that attempt and allow this process to continue so as not
> to delay or prevent the emergency process.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss