Re: [s-d] Proposal: hard rules

Peter Cooper Jr. on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:49:41 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Proposal: hard rules

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] Proposal: hard rules
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:49:32 -0500
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <2f4350400611240053u3299e8ecu5acc94c730e077ef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx's message of "Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:53:19 +0000")
Mail-followup-to: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
References: <2f4350400611220207t21269590w24f0f668d823f559@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <u8xi1iqir.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400611240053u3299e8ecu5acc94c730e077ef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> (BTW Peter, I'm assuming that your arguments are correct and that this
> proposal is somewhat redundant.  But a proposal seemed the logical
> full stop to our earlier discussion.)

I don't know if any of my arguments are correct. That's part of the
fun of the game. :)

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] Proposal: hard rules
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.
- Re: [s-d] Proposal: hard rules
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Judgement draft
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Judgement draft
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Proposal: hard rules
Next by thread: [s-d] Judgement draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread