Re: [s-d] Judgement draft

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

Resolved RFJs should probably be held in a public place - ideally,
against the rule(s) that they judge?

On 11/24/06, antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> for instance, i should remove the "The
> Administrator is the authority used to interpret the current state of
> the game." caluse from rule 1-5
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 12:26:41 PM
> Subject: [s-d] Judgement draft
>
> Hi all,
> I have written a draft (already wikified) for a proposal implementing Judgement.
> I would very much appreciate if you tell me what problems you can spot
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


-- 
It's Like This

Even the Samurai
Have teddy bears
And even the teddy bears
Get drunk
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss