Bryan Donlan on Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:54:14 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] CFI: All is Not Made Right.

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:39:49 -0600, Araltaln <araltaln@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:21:35 -0500, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, obviously I'm not capable of that, since I'm still not convinced
> > that they weren't legal even without this scam. Anyway, it doesn't
> > matter whether I can figure it out now; the important thing is whether
> > I could figure it out then, and it seems I couldn't.
> >
> > And even if I had, you'd have no way of knowing.
> You knew to invoke r699 when you originally attempted the actions, I'd
> argue that that indicates you knew they weren't legal.

It also implies he knew it'd be legal if he used r699.

spoon-discuss mailing list