Elliott Hird on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:28:40 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Further consultations on the Sharpener



On 16 Dec 2008, at 16:45, Craig Daniel wrote:

{Question: Did the Pencil Sharpener do anything at all?
Unbeliever: comex
Arguments: If the Sharpener procedure that destroys mackerel doesn't
succeed in doing so, it could be taken to mean that the entire
procedure failed. More likely, however, each step gets implemented as
a game action, and either works or doesn't; in this case, the Pencil
Sharpener did everything it was supposed to including plugging the
loophole, but comex is still the richest player in the game (followed
by me and Warrigal).}


NO. The procedure was defined as a series of actions and was performed
as one atomic one. The flaw needs fixing, and I request that people
do not abuse it further, as it's had its time.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business