Elliott Hird on Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:13:50 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Roster |
On 5 September 2012 22:19, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm, why not start from an assumption that we have that ruleset, and try > to fix everything from inside it? That's the B way. (Any arguments with > "but why are you playing from a ruleset that isn't the platonic one > arrived at following from the start of B" will be countered with > "because we /always/ do that, albeit usually unintentionally".) I suggest we both start playing the game with that ruleset, /and/ try to figure out a scam for the state we believed B was stuck in to unify the two game-states on the side. i.e., the only assumption that needs to be made is that such a bridge between the two exists and will be performed. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss