Elliott Hird on Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:31 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Game over? |
On 17 January 2012 13:37, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Emergencies include, but are not limited to, the following:..." > > I'd say a deadlock preventing further play is still an emergency. Unless another rule defines another way to start an emergency (while we're *still in one*), that doesn't really mean much. I mean, if an emergency automatically started whenever the dictionary definition of "emergency" applied, B would have never been out of one. > I've also always believed that all games, Nomic included, are instances of > Pure Nomic, and as such carry the unwritten rule that all players may, by > unanimous agreement, make any change to the rules or gamestate at any time. A fair position, but one not popular with the B zeitgeist for a few years before its death. Some of the players *did* exercise their right to play whatever game they want, but it was in the form of starting a new one (which quickly fizzled). _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss