| Eric Stucky on Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:17:47 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Initial ruleset for Γ |
On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Enacting rules is broken, because "the only text strings" in Law 5 >> refers only to "Remove law #" according to Law 4. >> >> As such, Remove law 4. >> > > Good call. I knew I'd break it somehow! > >> >> Also, um, as far as I can tell you simultaneously have to vote FOR all >> pending modifications, or AGAINST. That could be interesting... >> > > Yeah I was going to write in a mechanism for separate voting, then decided > this would be more fun! > > I proclaim a second unnamed nomic, with the ruleset below (between curly > brackets), which is more or less the same as the earlier one with law 4 > fixed and with the option to remove text removed for more weird fun. So we have two games, which are roughly the same except that #2 doesn't have the ability to remove laws, and #1 doesn't have the ability to add them. And they both use the same message board. This could be an interesting concept just on its own. Even if we do eliminate #1 Law 4, there's still 72 hours to make them as different as possible }:) -Turiski _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss