| Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:05:30 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:54 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Another thing which is important to consider here is that the clock has gone back to being zero based so nday 1 is the second day of the nweek. No, because the rule is incredibly stupid and says that the clock is zero-based but whenever you discuss the nday or nweek you add 1. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss